Issue - meetings

Gatwick Airport Limited (GAL) was preparing an application to the Secretary of State for a Development Consent Order (DCO) to allow use of the existing emergency runway for departures. A report was submitted which addressed the need to agree governance arrangements for submitting consultation responses on behalf of the Council in the context of the six stages of the DCO process, namely:

• a statutory 12-week consultation (9^th Sept to 1^st December 2021)
• DCO application submission to the Planning Inspectorate (July 2022)
• Acceptance of the application by the Planning Inspectorate (Aug 2022)
• Pre-examination preparation (Sept 2022 – Jan 2023)
• Examination conducted by the Planning Inspectorate (Jan – Jul 2023)
• Secretary of State review (June – Sept 2023)
• Earliest decision by the Secretary of State (Jan 2024)

The report explained that the Council would be required to make representations during the pre-examination and examination phases, including attendance at meetings convened by both GAL and the Planning Inspectorate; preparation of a Local Impact Report; input to a Statement of Common Ground; submission of representations during the examination; responses to the Planning Inspectorate’s written questions; and attendance at the examination hearings.

While the Council’s response to the initial statutory consultation was due to be considered by the Committee at its next scheduled meeting, subsequent submissions would need to be made within short timescales. Delegation arrangements were therefore sought to enable the Chief Executive and / or the Chief Planning Officer to make the necessary representations on the Council’s behalf.  

The Chair introduced the item by advising that GAL had now agreed that, in addition to scheduled visits to Lingfield, Caterham and Oxted, its mobile project office would also visit Burstow with the date and venue to be advised. It was also confirmed that GAL’s consultation team had agreed to provide a separate briefing for Tandridge Councillors. Officers were seeking to arrange a date during October for this.   

Officers commented on the significant workload implications for the Council associated with the consultation process. While the work would be led by the strategy team, other parts of the organisation (e.g. Development Management, Environmental Health and Emergency Planning) would also have to contribute, provisional allocations of working days for which had been identified for the respective areas. GAL would be providing £160,000 for a coordination service to assist the consultee authorities (which might also be available for staffing resources) but Chief Executives doubted whether this would be sufficient.    

Various views were expressed during the debate, including:

·           all Councillors should ensure that residents and Parish Councils were engaged in the consultation process

·           the wide geographical distribution of consultation roadshows (as far away as Brighton) could dilute environmental objections from communities close to the airport

·           the impact of greater volumes of airport related traffic on local roads (arising from an increase in passenger numbers) had been overlooked

·           GAL’s consultation process should not disadvantage those residents unable to engage via digital channels.

It was also clarified that, following representations, GAL would now be engaging with Parish Councils. The  ...  view the full minutes text for item 118