Agenda item

Reports of committees

Minutes:

The reports of Committee meetings since the 22nd July 2021 were presented for reception and adoption.

 

R E S O L V E D that the reports of the following meetings be received, and the recommendations therein be adopted:

 

            Planning Committee - 29th July 2021

 

            Separate votes were taken regarding the recommendations to grant planning permission under Minutes 93 and 94:

 

·     Minute 93 – Auckland Road, Caterham – demolition of existing garages and erection of three residential dwellings of a 2-storey nature (2021/636); and

 

·     Minute 94 – Windmill Close, Caterham – demolition of existing garages and erection of three residential dwellings of a single storey and 2-storey nature (2021/637).

 

            In both cases, the Council voted in favour of adopting the respective recommendation.

 

            In accordance with Standing Order 13(3), Councillor O’Driscoll wished it recorded that he abstained from voting on the recommendation to grant planning permission for the proposed Auckland Road development (Minute 94 above).

 

 

            Planning Policy Committee - 26th August 2021

 

 

            Planning Committee - 2nd September 2021

 

 

            Strategy & Resources Committee - 14th September 2021

 

 

            Planning Committee - 20th September 2021

 

 

            Community Services Committee - 21st September 2021 (subject to Councillor Moore being added to the list of those present, as substitute for Councillor Allen)

 

 

            Planning Policy Committee - 23rd September 2021

 

 

            Housing Committee - 28th September 2021

 

 

            Audit & Scrutiny Committee - 30th September 2021

 

 

            Strategy & Resources Committee - 5th October 2021

 

 

   Planning Committee - 7th October 2021

 

            A separate vote was taken regarding the recommendation to amend the Planning             Committee’s terms of reference to enable it to resolve all planning applications referred             to it, including those where the Council is the applicant. The Council voted in favour of adopting the recommendation. 

 

Supporting documents: